4/11/2023 0 Comments Registration failed torchatIn our case, at first glance, different solutions have exactly the same formula, clearly developed in one center: the UOC means propaganda, the "Russian world" means to split or ban. Former President Petro Poroshenko's sympathizers with his "Eurosolidarity", the so-called "vacuum cleaners", immediately began to fill the media space with "expert" accusations of Bankova's defeatist sentiments and talk about the threat of capitulation. For example, recently, in the midst of the then still apparently vigorous Ukrainian-Russian peace talks, the President's Office began to issue cautious hints at the possibility of renouncing NATO membership in exchange for the return of territories. Just like in political flash mobs, when advocates for a particular political force disperse the "betrayal" of competitors or the "victory" of their patron on social networks, without bothering to search for original ideas and theses. Only with microscopic linguistic nuances: in one document "pro-Russian propaganda", in another – "propaganda of the ‘Russian world’", in one "anti-Ukrainian activity", in another – "ideological work for the enemy", etc. Reading a dozen of resolutions for the umpteenth time, one cannot but get rid of the deja vu feeling: the wording seems to be different, but at the same time it seems to be written off like a copier. Does the order of addends change the sum? to total bans: "To prohibit the activities of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church on the territory of the Konotop City Council" (order of the Konotop mayor).Īll the above is wrapped in instructions to law enforcement agencies to seal the UOC temples.from appeals to the schismatics: " We call on all churches belonging to the UOC-MP to hold a parish meeting and decide on the transition to the jurisdiction of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine" (appeal of the Kazatin City Council).Verdicts on what to do with the "Propaganda Church" in the entrusted territory of local authorities vary slightly: According to the deputies, "during its existence in the territory of our state, the UOC has been an instrument of propaganda of the 'Russian world', and still remains the leading information force in the war waged by the Russian Federation against Ukraine."Īny documented facts? Any offences recorded by security forces? Any court decisions? Well, Ovruch deputies do not care about such “trifles”.Ī similar statement was made by the mayor of Konotop Artem Seminykhin: "Given the open pro-Russian propaganda in the temples of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, ban activities the territory of the Konotop City Council."Īny examples of specific statements or sermons? Any expert conclusions on which of the formulations can be considered propagandist? Any court verdicts? Again, no bother?Ī similar pattern occurs in every case without exception. Let’s take a look at the appeal of the Ovruch City Council, for example. But no one even tries to provide at least some kind of evidence base. All these documents are richly variegated with emotional images and worn-out stamps taken from the "patriot" dictionary. At the moment more than a dozen settlements of Ukraine have decided to terminate the activities of the UOC in one form or another.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |